![]() ![]() ĭung beetles may be easily sampled using inexpensive baited pitfall traps. Furthermore, they may be separated into ecologically meaningful functional groups based upon diel activity, body size and one of three breeding strategies, rollers, tunnellers and dwellers, that determine rates of dung removal, seed dispersal and germination. They also fulfil several important functional roles including secondary seed dispersal, soil turbation, parasite suppression and nutrient cycling, and these functional roles can be easily manipulated in the field. They are cost-effective to survey, can be rapidly sampled using baited pitfall traps, and are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances and habitat change. Inaccurate sampling may lead to spurious conclusions regarding the responses of species to anthropogenic processes and so it is essential that researchers implement standardised sampling protocols on appropriate indicator taxa.ĭung beetles are emerging as an increasingly popular focal taxon for ecological research. Quantifying ecological processes and the effects of anthropogenic disturbance requires us to have an accurate and comparable representation of ecological assemblages. Assessing the comparability of assemblage samples collected using different baits represents an important step to facilitating large-scale meta-analyses of dung beetle assemblages collected using non-standard methodology. We suggest that a 10:90 human:pig ratio, or similar, is an ideal compromise between sampling efficiency, inter-study comparability and the availability of large quantities of bait for sampling Amazonian dung beetles. The assemblages sampled were remarkably consistent across baits, and ordination analyses showed that the assemblages sampled by mixed dung baits were not significantly different from that captured by pure human dung, with the assemblages sampled by 10% and 90% pig mixes structurally most similar to assemblages sampled by human dung. There were no significant differences between richness and abundance sampled by each bait. Analyses focussed on the comparability of sampling with pig or human-pig dung mixes with studies that have sampled using human dung. We tested the ability of human and pig dung to attract a primary forest dung beetle assemblage, as well as three mixes of the two baits in different proportions. By contrast, pigs may produce up to 20 times the volume. ![]() In general, human dung is the preferred choice, however, it is often in short supply, which can severely limit sampling effort. In particular, bait choice is often led by the idiosyncrasies of the researcher, logistic problems and the dung sources available, which leads to difficulties for inter-study comparisons. ![]() Although there is now a wealth of available data on dung beetle communities from around the world, there is a lack of standardisation between sampling protocols for accurately sampling dung beetle communities. Dung beetles have emerged as a widely used focal taxon in environmental studies and can be sampled quickly and inexpensively using baited pitfalls. The accurate sampling of communities is vital to any investigation of ecological processes and biodiversity. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |